Gall 2017 PLoS Biol: Difference between revisions
From Bioblast
(Created page with "{{Publication |title=Gall T, Ioannidis JPA, Maniadis Z (2017) The credibility crisis in research: Can economics tools help?. PLoS Biol 15:e2001846. https://doi.org/10.1371/jou...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Publication | {{Publication | ||
|title=Gall T, Ioannidis JPA, Maniadis Z (2017) The credibility crisis in research: Can economics tools help? | |title=Gall T, Ioannidis JPA, Maniadis Z (2017) The credibility crisis in research: Can economics tools help? PLoS Biol 15:e2001846. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001846 | ||
|info=[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28445470/ PMID: 28445470 Open Access] | |info=[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28445470/ PMID: 28445470 Open Access] | ||
|authors=Gall T, Ioannidis JPA, Maniadis Z | |authors=Gall T, Ioannidis JPA, Maniadis Z | ||
Revision as of 20:02, 1 June 2023
| Gall T, Ioannidis JPA, Maniadis Z (2017) The credibility crisis in research: Can economics tools help? PLoS Biol 15:e2001846. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001846 |
Gall T, Ioannidis JPA, Maniadis Z (2017) PLoS Biol
Abstract: The issue of nonreplicable evidence has attracted considerable attention across biomedical and other sciences. This concern is accompanied by an increasing interest in reforming research incentives and practices. How to optimally perform these reforms is a scientific problem in itself, and economics has several scientific methods that can help evaluate research reforms. Here, we review these methods and show their potential. Prominent among them are mathematical modeling and laboratory experiments that constitute affordable ways to approximate the effects of policies with wide-ranging implications.
• Bioblast editor: Gnaiger E
Labels:
Publication efficiency
