AMCTB 2016 Anal Methods: Difference between revisions
From Bioblast
(Created page with "{{Publication |title=Analytical methods committee (2016) z-Scores and other scores in chemical proficiency testing—their meanings, and some common misconceptions. RSC 74. |i...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|authors=Analytical methods committee | |authors=Analytical methods committee | ||
|year=2016 | |year=2016 | ||
|journal= | |journal=Anal Methods | ||
|abstract=z-Scores were devised to provide a transparent but widely-applicable scoring system for participants in proficiency tests for analytical laboratories. The essential idea is to provide an appropriate scaling of the difference between a participant’s result and the ‘assigned value’ for the concentration of the analyte. Interpretation of a z-score is straightforward but some aspects need careful attention to avoid misconception. Over time several related scores have been devised to cope with a diversified range of applications. The main types of score have recently been codified in ISO 13528 (2015). | |abstract=z-Scores were devised to provide a transparent but widely-applicable scoring system for participants in proficiency tests for analytical laboratories. The essential idea is to provide an appropriate scaling of the difference between a participant’s result and the ‘assigned value’ for the concentration of the analyte. Interpretation of a z-score is straightforward but some aspects need careful attention to avoid misconception. Over time several related scores have been devised to cope with a diversified range of applications. The main types of score have recently been codified in ISO 13528 (2015). | ||
|editor=[[Iglesias-Gonzalez J]] | |editor=[[Iglesias-Gonzalez J]] | ||
Revision as of 22:23, 25 January 2021
| Analytical methods committee (2016) z-Scores and other scores in chemical proficiency testing—their meanings, and some common misconceptions. RSC 74. |
Analytical methods committee (2016) Anal Methods
Abstract: z-Scores were devised to provide a transparent but widely-applicable scoring system for participants in proficiency tests for analytical laboratories. The essential idea is to provide an appropriate scaling of the difference between a participant’s result and the ‘assigned value’ for the concentration of the analyte. Interpretation of a z-score is straightforward but some aspects need careful attention to avoid misconception. Over time several related scores have been devised to cope with a diversified range of applications. The main types of score have recently been codified in ISO 13528 (2015).
• Bioblast editor: Iglesias-Gonzalez J
Labels:
MitoFit 2021 PT
