Difference between revisions of "AMCTB 2016 Anal Methods"
(Created page with "{{Publication |title=Analytical methods committee (2016) z-Scores and other scores in chemical proficiency testingātheir meanings, and some common misconceptions. RSC 74. |i...") Ā |
m (Iglesias-Gonzalez Javier moved page Analytical 2016 to AMCTB 2016 Anal Methods) Ā |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Publication | {{Publication | ||
|title=Analytical methods committee (2016) z-Scores and other scores in chemical proficiency testingātheir meanings, and some common misconceptions. | |title=Analytical methods committee, AMCTB No. 74 (2016) z-Scores and other scores in chemical proficiency testingātheir meanings, and some common misconceptions. Anal Methods 8:5553-5555. | ||
|info=[https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2016/ay/c6ay90078j Open Access] | |info=[https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2016/ay/c6ay90078j Open Access] | ||
|authors=Analytical methods committee | |authors=Analytical methods committee | ||
|year=2016 | |year=2016 | ||
|journal= | |journal=Anal Methods | ||
|abstract=z-Scores were devised to provide a transparent but widely-applicable scoring system for participants in proficiency tests for analytical laboratories. The essential idea is to provide an appropriate scaling of the difference between a participantās result and the āassigned valueā for the concentration of the analyte. Interpretation of a z-score is straightforward but some aspects need careful attention to avoid misconception. Over time several related scores have been devised to cope with a diversified range of applications. The main types of score have recently been codified in ISO 13528 (2015). | |abstract=z-Scores were devised to provide a transparent but widely-applicable scoring system for participants in proficiency tests for analytical laboratories. The essential idea is to provide an appropriate scaling of the difference between a participantās result and the āassigned valueā for the concentration of the analyte. Interpretation of a z-score is straightforward but some aspects need careful attention to avoid misconception. Over time several related scores have been devised to cope with a diversified range of applications. The main types of score have recently been codified in ISO 13528 (2015). | ||
|editor=[[Iglesias-Gonzalez J]] | |editor=[[Iglesias-Gonzalez J]] | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Cited by == | |||
{{Template:Cited by Iglesias-Gonzalez 2021 MitoFit PT}} | |||
{{Labeling | {{Labeling | ||
|additional=MitoFit 2021 PT | |additional=MitoFit 2021 PT | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:47, 26 January 2021
| Analytical methods committee, AMCTB No. 74 (2016) z-Scores and other scores in chemical proficiency testingātheir meanings, and some common misconceptions. Anal Methods 8:5553-5555. |
Ā» Open Access
Analytical methods committee (2016) Anal Methods
Abstract: z-Scores were devised to provide a transparent but widely-applicable scoring system for participants in proficiency tests for analytical laboratories. The essential idea is to provide an appropriate scaling of the difference between a participantās result and the āassigned valueā for the concentration of the analyte. Interpretation of a z-score is straightforward but some aspects need careful attention to avoid misconception. Over time several related scores have been devised to cope with a diversified range of applications. The main types of score have recently been codified in ISO 13528 (2015).
ā¢ Bioblast editor: Iglesias-Gonzalez J
Cited by
- Iglesias-Gonzalez et al (2021) Proficiency test in mt-respiration: A necessary tool for reliable and reproducible results. MitoFit Preprints 2021 (in prep).
Labels:
MitoFit 2021 PT
